The Scandinavian Hiring Paradox

When Labour Shortages Meet Hiring Exclusion

Photo by shepherd on Unsplash

Executive Summary

Across Scandinavia, companies report severe labour shortages while tens of thousands of qualified candidates remain unemployed.

The paradox is structural, not accidental. In Norway, Sweden, Denmark, and Finland, research, recruitment surveys and official job-search guidance commonly estimate that a majority — often around 60–70% — of all hires occur through informal channels: personal networks, unsolicited applications and internal referrals that effectively exclude foreigners, minorities, and anyone outside established professional circles.

Despite comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation, enforcement remains weak. Informal hiring culture neutralizes equality frameworks. Employers justify exclusion through subjective criteria like “cultural fit” and “team chemistry.”

The result: Governments invest heavily in attracting international professionals who leave within 2–3 years after failing to find suitable employment. The region faces a self-inflicted talent shortage.

The path forward: Unless hiring transparency, anonymized screening, and process accountability replace trust-based recruitment, Scandinavia’s celebrated equality will remain theoretical, and its competence crisis will persist.

---

1. Demographics and Labour Supply

All four countries share structural demographic pressures:

Sources: Statistics Norway (SSB)¹, Statistics Sweden (SCB)², Danmarks Statistik³, Statistics Finland⁴, Nordic demographic overviews.

Each country’s welfare system depends on maintaining a high labour-force participation rate. But ageing populations and low birth rates make foreign talent essential.

Despite this, recent data show that net immigration to key urban regions has fallen from earlier peaks, and surveys of international talent in Finland and elsewhere indicate that many highly skilled workers consider leaving after struggling to access suitable jobs.⁵⁶

---

2. Employers’ Perspective

2.1 Norway

According to NHO’s Kompetansebarometer 2025, six out of ten Norwegian companies report unmet competence needs.⁷

“Mangel på rett kompetanse er den største vekstbremsen.”

“The lack of the right competence is the biggest brake on growth.” – NHO ⁷

2.2 Sweden

In the Swedish Public Employment Service (Arbetsförmedlingen) labour market outlook, a majority of employers report difficulty filling positions, particularly in tech, healthcare, and construction.⁸

“Vi söker rätt person, inte bara rätt kompetens.”

“We’re looking for the right person, not just the right skills.” – Swedish HR Director, Dagens Nyheter, 2025⁹

2.3 Denmark

Dansk Industri (DI) reports similar figures: around six in ten firms face recruitment challenges, with roughly one in five hiring attempts failing entirely.¹⁰

“Jobopslag er ofte bare teater.”

“Job postings are often just theatre.” – HR Manager quoted in Berlingske, 2025¹¹

2.4 Finland

In Finland, more than half of companies report serious recruitment difficulties, yet foreign professionals remain underemployed. ^{6 25}

“Me sanomme, että tarvitsemme kansainvälistä osaamista, mutta emme ole valmiita palkkaamaan sitä.”

“We say we need international expertise, but we’re not ready to hire it.” – HR Manager, Helsingin Sanomat, 2025¹²

Across all four countries, employers frame the challenge as a skills shortage rather than a hiring problem.

However, the evidence shows a persistent gap between available competence and hiring willingness — particularly when candidates are foreign-born, non-native speakers, or otherwise outside established professional networks. ^{7 8 10 19 20 21}

---

3. How Hiring Actually Works

The Scandinavian labour markets operate on trust and informality.

Research, recruitment surveys, and official job-search guidance across the region commonly estimate that a majority — often on the order of 60–70% — of hires occur through personal contacts, unsolicited applications or internal candidates, rather than open competition for an advertised vacancy.¹³¹⁴¹⁵

The pattern is consistent:

• Denmark: Recruitment analyses such as Ballisager’s Rekrutteringsanalysen show that companies frequently fill roles via networks, unsolicited applications and internal candidates, and municipalities note that many posts are effectively decided before formal advertisement.¹³

• Sweden: A 2023 Unionen survey reported in Kollega found that around 60% of white-collar workers had found their latest job through the “dolda arbetsmarknaden” (hidden job market) — networks, unsolicited applications, and previous contacts — rather than an open advertisement. ⁸

• Finland: Guidance from Work in Finland and TE services states that an estimated 60–70% of Finnish jobs are never publicly advertised, and urges jobseekers to target the hidden job market. ¹⁵

• Norway: Career material and research on recruitment in Norway highlight a similar “hidden job market”, where many vacancies are filled via personal contacts and recommendations long before — or instead of — public posting. ^{5 19}

Public postings serve a symbolic or legal purpose — satisfying transparency requirements — but in practice, many roles already have a preferred candidate.

“We post jobs publicly because we have to, not because we need more applicants.” – Anonymous employer, Svenskt Näringsliv 2025 ¹⁶

This informal structure makes hiring faster and culturally cohesive but excludes newcomers — particularly foreigners, minorities, and even Danes, Swedes, Norwegians or Finns who have lived abroad or just graduated.

---

4. Candidates’ Experience

Despite decades of equality legislation, discrimination persists at measurable levels.

• Sweden: Field experiments (Carlsson & Rooth and later work) show that applicants with Arabic-sounding names receive roughly 25–50% fewer callbacks than equally qualified applicants with Swedish-sounding names.¹⁷

• Denmark: A recent field experiment involving hundreds of real vacancies, linked to Aarhus University, found that applicants with traditionally Danish names were around 50–60% more likely to be invited to interview than equally qualified applicants with Middle Eastern names.¹⁸

• Norway: Statistics Norway finds that immigrants with higher education are nearly three times as likely to be overqualified for their jobs as native-born workers (about 40% vs 14%), indicating systematic mismatch and underutilisation of skills.¹⁹

• Finland: Government-commissioned studies and academic research show that roughly one-third to two-fifths of highly educated immigrants work below their qualification level, even after obtaining Finnish degrees or learning the language.²⁰

For many international professionals, this bias compounds with lack of access to networks. Even when fluent in the local language, many report rejection on grounds of “fit” or “communication style” — soft criteria masking cultural exclusion. ^{6 21}

“Jeg fik at vide, jeg var overkvalificeret – men det, de mente, var, at jeg ikke var dansk nok.”

“I was told I was overqualified — but what they meant was that I wasn’t Danish enough.” – Respondent, IDA 2025 ²¹

---

5. What Has Been Done So Far — and With What Results

Across all four countries, governments have legislated inclusion and funded attraction — but have not reformed the hiring process itself.

The result is predictable: participation in programmes rises, outcomes do not. ²² ²³ ²⁴ ²⁵

---

6. Structural Commonalities

Demographic pressure

Ageing and low fertility strain labour supply across Scandinavia; Finland has the oldest population structure, Norway the youngest, but all four face rising old-age dependency ratios. ^{1 2 3 4}

Network dependence

A majority of hires occur via networks, unsolicited applications or internal mobility, often bypassing open recruitment. ^{13 14 15}

Language as a gatekeeper

Native-level language proficiency is often required even for roles that could be done in English or another common working language. Employers frequently use language as a proxy for trust and “fit”, not just for task performance.^{6 20}

Weak enforcement

Equality laws exist, but penalties and proactive audits are rare. Enforcement relies heavily on individuals filing complaints, which many never do. ^{22 23 24}

Cultural fit over competence

“Trust culture” and notions of “personal chemistry” reward similarity of background and communication style more than demonstrable skills. ^{9 11 27}

Retention failures

International graduates and expats leave after repeated rejection or underemployment, as highlighted by Finnish and Nordic talent-retention studies. ^{6 20 25}

The combination creates a closed ecosystem: jobs circulate among those already inside it.

6.1 The Cost of the Paradox

Economic

OECD modelling suggests that closing the foreign-born employment gap (currently around 10–14 percentage points in many Nordic countries) could add roughly 1.5–2.5% to GDP by 2030.²⁶

The employment gap is particularly pronounced for non-Western immigrants:

Source: Nordic Council of Ministers / OECD aggregated data on immigrant employment. ²⁶

The green transition and digitalisation agendas both face delays due to skill shortages — despite thousands of qualified specialists already residing in the Nordics. ^{7 8 10 26}

Social

Persistent exclusion erodes trust in institutions that pride themselves on equality. Integration programmes cost millions annually, but when professionals remain underemployed, they often emigrate — taking taxpayer-funded training and education with them. ^{6 22 23 25}

Cultural

The informal, consensus-based hiring style strengthens community ties but reproduces homogeneity.

As Finnish sociologist Pekka Räsänen wrote:

“Sopivuus on suomalaisen työelämän hiljainen koodi.”

“Fit is the silent code of Finnish working life.” ²⁷

That silent code exists across Scandinavia.

---

8. Current Policy Proposals in Nordic Labour Market Debates

The Nordic countries already have the policy frameworks needed to support equality; what they lack is process reform.

A true merit-based model would focus on inputs (how hiring is done) rather than outputs (how many minorities are employed).

Proposals under discussion:

Anonymised screening

Apply anonymised CV evaluation (removing name, age, photo and address) to all public-sector and government-funded roles, and strongly encourage it for larger private employers. ^{16 22 23}

Transparency audits

Require proof that posted jobs represent real, open competitions — for example, via basic statistics on internal vs external hires.

Outcome-based funding

Tie public diversity and inclusion grants to measurable hiring, promotion and retention outcomes, not just the existence of strategies. ^{22 23 24}

Language flexibility

Require local-language proficiency only for roles with documented customer-facing, safety or regulatory needs, rather than as a default requirement. ^{20 25}

Process redesign

Treat recruitment as a designed system: introduce standardised, bias-aware evaluation rubrics and structured interviews as the norm. ^{16 28}

If applied across the region, these reforms could restore fairness without undermining trust-based culture.

“We can have equality of opportunity — or we can keep our informal networks. But we cannot have both.” – Labour economist, FAOS 2025²⁸

9. Outlook

The Scandinavian hiring paradox is not a mystery; it is a mirror.

Every country in the region recognises its dependence on foreign labour but resists the openness that genuine meritocracy requires. ^{5 6 25 26}

As long as the hiring system prioritises “who you know” over “what you can do,” the talent shortage will persist — self-inflicted, predictable, and entirely solvable. ^{13 14 15 28}

---

---

Visit the country specific articles:

Denmark - Finland - Norway - Sweden

---

References

1. Statistics Norway (SSB). Population and Demography. https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning

2. Statistics Sweden (SCB). Demographic Reports and Fertility Statistics (incl. “Historiskt lågt fruktsamhetstal 2023”). https://www.scb.se/

3. Danmarks Statistik. Population 2025 and Fertility Indicators. https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/emner/borgere/befolkning

4. Statistics Finland (Tilastokeskus). Population and Births 2024 (Total Fertility Rate). https://stat.fi/en/publication/cl8dr2w7zx4q10cwsl8l6bqjz

5. Oslo Business Region. Oslo Outlook / Net Immigration Developments 2024. https://oslobusinessregion.no

6. Sitra. International Talent Survey 2024 – Why International Experts Stay or Leave. https://www.sitra.fi/en/publications/

7. NHO. Kompetansebarometer 2024/2025. https://www.nho.no/tema/kompetanse-og-utdanning/artikler/kompetansebarometeret/

8. Arbetsförmedlingen. Arbetsmarknadsprognos / Prognos 2025. https://arbetsformedlingen.se/om-oss/statistik-och-analyser/arbetsmarknadsprognoser

9. Dagens Nyheter. “Vi söker rätt person, inte bara rätt kompetens.” 2025. https://www.dn.se

10. Dansk Industri (DI). Virksomhedsbarometer / analyser om mangel på arbejdskraft. https://www.danskindustri.dk/arkiv/analyser/

11. Berlingske. “Jobopslag er bare teater.” 2025. https://www.berlingske.dk

12. Helsingin Sanomat. “Tarvitsemme kansainvälistä osaamista – mutta emme palkkaa sitä.” 2025. https://www.hs.fi

13. Konsulenthuset Ballisager. Rekrutteringsanalysen 2024/2025. https://ballisager.com/rekrutteringsanalyse

14. IFAU / Swedish research on recruitment and networks. Overview: https://ifau.se

15. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, Finland (TEM). Information on recruitment practices and the hidden job market. https://tem.fi/en/labour-migration-and-integration

16. Svenskt Näringsliv. Employer interviews and analyses on recruitment and the hidden job market. https://www.svensktnaringsliv.se

17. Carlsson, M. & Rooth, D.-O. (2007). Evidence of Ethnic Discrimination in the Swedish Labor Market Using Experimental Data. Labour Economics, 14(4), 716–729. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927537107000064

18. Danish field experiment on ethnic bias in hiring (Aarhus University et al.). See e.g. conference proceedings referencing the correspondence test: https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/files/290537252/tal2024-conference-proceedings.pdf

19. OsloMet / SSB analyses on immigrants’ labour-market position and overqualification. SSB article (overqualification): https://www.ssb.no/en/arbeid-og-lonn/artikler-og-publikasjoner/many-immigrants-are-overqualified-for-their-job

20. University of Eastern Finland & Business Finland. Finland attracts international talent but struggles to retain it. https://www.uef.fi/en/article/finland-attracts-international-talent-but-struggles-to-retain-it

21. IDA (Ingeniørforeningen). Survey on International Engineers in Denmark 2025. https://ida.dk

22. Norwegian Equality and Anti-Discrimination Ombud (LDO). Annual Report 2024. https://www.ldo.no/en/about-ldo/publications/

23. Arbetsförmedlingen / Delegationen för unga och nyanlända til arbeid (DUA). Final reports and evaluations. https://arbetsformedlingen.se/om-oss/samarbeten-och-projekt/dua

24. Ministry of Employment, Denmark (Beskæftigelsesministeriet). Integration gennem job – Evalueringer. https://bm.dk/aktuelt/publikationer

25. Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment (TEM). Talent Boost Programme – Evaluations and Reports. https://tem.fi/en/talent-boost-programme

26. OECD. Employment Outlook 2025 – Nordic Region Chapters (Immigrant Employment Gaps and Growth Effects). https://www.oecd.org/employment-outlook/

27. Räsänen, P. (2025). Sopivuuden kulttuuri suomalaisessa työelämässä. Turku University Press. https://www.utupub.fi

28. FAOS, University of Copenhagen. Rekruttering og tillid and interviews with Mikkel Mailand on recruitment, networks and equality. https://faos.ku.dk